This is one of those entries that will be of more interest to a specific subgroup of those who follow this blog. It’s about findings and some controversies in the field of couple relationship education (CRE; also often called marriage and relationship education). For the rest of you, I promise something fun later next week.
In July, I gave a plenary address at the National Association of Relationship and Marriage Education annual conference in Baltimore. I had two goals in this talk.
Goal #1: My first goal was to present an update of findings from our study of CRE delivered to US Army couples by chaplains. Some of those findings have already been published but I also presented the findings from the most recent analyses that will go into journal reports we are writing at this time. My co-investigators in this work are Elizabeth Allen, Howard Markman, & Galena Rhoades, and the study is funded by The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).
Goal #2: My second goal was to address some issues raised in recent discussions about the impact of CRE. I do this by covering some specific findings from three large samples (including the Army study) as well as meta-analyses of an array of studies. If you are interested in the debates about the government efforts in the past decade that funded some community efforts that used CRE, I cover some of the important issues in my talk.
I’ll try for something edgy on dating and mating in a week and a half or so!